Trump threatens 50 percent EU tariffs, sparking fears of global economic fallout

Trump’s EU tariff threat could trigger recession in Europe, stifle U.S. growth, and shake global markets.

US President Donald Trump walks across the South Lawn of the White House before boarding Marine One in Washington, DC, on May 23, 2025. Photo by Samuel Corum/Bloomberg

By Clarisa Sendy and Anna Fadiah

President Trump’s recent announcement that he will impose a sweeping 50 percent tariff on all goods imported from the European Union as early as next weekend has sparked immediate concern among economists, business leaders, and international policymakers. The Trump EU tariff threat—the latest escalation in his erratic trade policy—poses a significant danger to global economic stability and has already sent shockwaves through financial markets.

"This move came out of nowhere," said Agathe Demarais, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations. “We essentially don’t have a clue as to what it means.”

Whether this abrupt warning is a negotiating tactic, a serious policy threat, or a rhetorical outburst remains unclear. But experts agree that if implemented, the consequences would be far-reaching and damaging—not just for the European economy, but for the United States and global markets alike.

Economic risks loom large for U.S. and EU

Carsten Brzeski, chief eurozone economist at ING, emphasized that such a drastic tariff could result in the worst of both worlds for the U.S. economy: higher inflation and slower growth. The European economy, already teetering under inflationary pressures and sluggish recovery, could plunge into a recession.

Julian Hinz, a trade researcher at Germany’s Kiel Institute for the World Economy, estimated that U.S. GDP could decline by 1.5 percent if the tariffs take effect. Such a drop would deal a significant blow to an economy already grappling with slowing investment and rising federal debt.

The scale of this proposed tariff is unprecedented compared to previous measures. In April, Trump floated a 20 percent “reciprocal” tariff on EU imports—already a provocative figure—but this new 50 percent levy far exceeds that, particularly when added on top of existing 10 percent across-the-board tariffs.

Financial markets and firms reel from policy whiplash

The manner in which the Trump EU tariff threat was delivered—via an unprompted Truth Social post—has only deepened uncertainty. For economists like Neil Shearing of Capital Economics, the haphazard announcement undermines global confidence in U.S. economic policy.

“This all points to concerns about policy direction in the U.S. lacking credibility,” Shearing said. “The guardrails are coming off.”

Moody’s recent downgrade of the U.S. credit rating highlighted similar concerns about ballooning debt and unpredictable fiscal strategy. For businesses considering investments in the United States, this volatility is a deterrent.

Mary E. Lovely, an emeritus economics professor at Syracuse University, noted that companies are becoming wary. “One of the president’s big goals is to increase investment,” she said. “But who wants to do manufacturing here when the president at any moment might put high taxes on things that you buy to produce?”

Pattern of escalation and retreat clouds outlook

Trump’s trade strategy has often followed a pattern: issue an aggressive threat, backtrack when markets react, and then resume pressure in a different form. In past confrontations with China, he threatened tariffs as high as 145 percent, only to later step back after China retaliated with similarly massive levies.

Just two weeks ago, the U.S. and China agreed to suspend planned tariff hikes for 90 days to restart negotiations—a familiar retreat after intense saber-rattling.

This track record is not lost on European officials. “We’ve already seen what’s happened with China, which is that he climbed down,” said Maurice Obstfeld, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and former IMF chief economist.

But Europe may be less likely to yield. The European Union, composed of 27 distinct member states with varying economic interests, requires consensus to make major trade decisions. Trump’s assumption that Europe can be pressured into quick concessions reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of how the EU operates.

Europe prepares countermeasures amid growing tensions

Despite the political complexity, EU leaders are not standing idle. European trade authorities have drafted a set of retaliatory tariffs targeting American goods and services. With nearly 20 percent of EU exports going to the U.S.—and vice versa—the stakes are high for both regions.

“Both sides have the ability to inflict substantial damage,” said Obstfeld.

In addition to levies on U.S. auto exports and food products, the EU is exploring measures targeting the American services sector—especially technology, finance, and travel industries, which dominate the U.S. economy and serve large European consumer bases.

Ireland and Germany face highest economic exposure

If the tariffs are enacted on June 1, the impact will be uneven across Europe. Ireland, whose economy is tightly interwoven with U.S. firms and trade, would be hardest hit. Capital Economics projects a 4 percent drop in Irish GDP.

Germany, Europe’s economic powerhouse and leading industrial exporter, is expected to see its GDP shrink by 1.5 percent, while Italy and France would contract by 1.2 and 0.75 percent, respectively. Spain would also experience a 0.5 percent decline in total output.

Leadership confusion and domestic politics at play

Some economists argue that Trump’s trade pronouncements are influenced less by strategic planning and more by internal political dynamics. Mark Blyth, a political economist at Brown University, suggested that such decisions may hinge on whichever adviser last spoke to the president.

Trump has repeatedly accused the European Union of “ripping off” the United States—an accusation that ignores the reality of relative economic size. “In 2008, both the U.S. and Europe had similar-sized economies,” Blyth pointed out. “Now Europe is one-third smaller. How can you be ripped off by someone who is poorer than you?”

A volatile path ahead

As June 1 approaches, the Trump EU tariff threat adds another layer of uncertainty to the already fragile global economic outlook. While it remains to be seen whether Trump will follow through, the warning alone has been enough to spook markets, rattle allies, and inject further unpredictability into global trade.

Whether this is a high-stakes gambit to extract concessions or simply the latest in a series of disruptive outbursts, the effects are already being felt—on Wall Street, in Brussels, and across boardrooms from Detroit to Dublin.

Explore more in Politics

• EU holds off retaliation against Trump tariffs ahead of NATO Summit
• G7 finance leaders meet in Canada amid Trump tariffs and Ukraine war concerns
• Trump attacks federal judge over South Sudan deportation ruling